Skip to content
Home » Indian cricket player salary: BCCI contracts, IPL & match fees

Indian cricket player salary: BCCI contracts, IPL & match fees

    Indian cricket player salary: BCCI contracts, IPL & match fees

    Updated: latest contract cycle

    Indian cricketers are paid through a layered system that blends BCCI central contracts, per‑match fees for Tests, ODIs and T20Is, domestic match fees, tournament bonuses, and commercial income from the IPL and endorsements. This guide consolidates the moving pieces into one authoritative, continuously updated hub that reflects how money actually flows in Indian cricket.

    Key snapshot at a glance

    • BCCI central contracts (men): A+ ₹7 crore, A ₹5 crore, B ₹3 crore, C ₹1 crore (annual retainers).
    • India per‑match fee (men and women): Test ₹15 lakh, ODI ₹6 lakh, T20I ₹3 lakh (for the playing XI).
    • IPL salaries: top Indian retainers and auction buys typically ₹10–20 crore per season, paid by franchises; separate from BCCI income.
    • Domestic match fees (senior men): Ranji Trophy paid per day of play with an experience‑based slab; white‑ball tournaments paid per game at lower day rates than Ranji.
    • Women’s central contracts: three‑grade retainer structure (A/B/C) with equal international match fees to men; WPL salaries add a franchise layer similar to the IPL.
    • Allowances, bonuses and benefits: daily travel per diem, prize‑money shares, injury insurance, and a pension scheme for retired players.

    What “salary” really means in Indian cricket

    Cricket isn’t a single paycheck. It’s a portfolio. A top India player may combine:

    • A BCCI retainer (fixed annual grade fee).
    • Per‑match fees for each international cap, plus incentives.
    • IPL compensation (retention or auction price) paid by a franchise.
    • Domestic match fees when available for state sides (often limited by international schedules).
    • Bonuses for series wins and ICC tournament runs.
    • Endorsements, appearance fees, and social media campaigns.

    An up‑and‑coming domestic pro’s blend looks different. The retainer might be absent, but Ranji and white‑ball match fees add up across a long season. A breakthrough in the IPL or WPL can multiply earnings overnight. The structure is intentionally layered so that consistent national performance, red‑ball commitment, and pathway progression are all rewarded.

    BCCI central contracts (men): A+, A, B, C retainers

    The central contract is the spine of an Indian cricketer’s annual income from the board. It is not a monthly salary but a guaranteed retainer for the contract cycle, separate from per‑match fees and bonuses. Grades reflect seniority, performance, and role in the team across formats.

    Men’s central contracts (retainers)

    • Grade A+: ₹7,00,00,000 (₹7 crore)
    • Grade A: ₹5,00,00,000 (₹5 crore)
    • Grade B: ₹3,00,00,000 (₹3 crore)
    • Grade C: ₹1,00,00,000 (₹1 crore)

    How grading works in practice

    • Selection and performance: Multi‑format mainstays tend to occupy A+ and A, with A+ reserved for those central to India’s plans and workload across formats, usually including a fast bowler or two and at least one batting anchor.
    • Flexibility: Grades are reviewed every cycle. A breakout player can jump multiple grades; a long‑term absentee can drop. White‑ball specialists often sit in A or B unless they anchor both formats or the leadership group.
    • Mid‑cycle realities: There is no mid‑cycle retainer rewrite as a rule, but match fees and bonuses keep earnings dynamic even when a player’s grade is stable.

    India match fees: Test, ODI, T20I

    Match fees are paid to the playing XI for each international match. Reserves and standbys travel on per diems and allowances but do not receive match fees unless they take the field as a substitute under the playing conditions (for example, a concussion substitute who is treated as a full playing member for that match).

    International per‑match fee (men and women; playing XI)

    • Test: ₹15,00,000 per match
    • One‑Day International: ₹6,00,000 per match
    • T20 International: ₹3,00,000 per match

    Important fine print

    • Match definition: A Test fee is attributed once you take the field in that match. For a multi‑day Test, there is no extra daily top‑up; it’s a single fee per Test.
    • Substitutes: A concussion substitute replacing a concussed player is eligible for the match fee; other substitutes are not.
    • Deductions: Code‑of‑conduct fines can be deducted from match fees. Suspensions naturally foreclose the fee.

    Test incentives and red‑ball commitment: The board has layered additional incentives onto red‑ball cricket to reflect its primacy. Regular Test participation across a cycle can unlock bonuses stacked on top of the ₹15 lakh base, effectively turning a heavy red‑ball workload into the most lucrative format on a per‑day basis. This is not just symbolism; players who opt into grueling overseas tours and dense Test schedules are materially rewarded.

    Daily allowances, series bonuses and prize pools

    • Per diem: Players on tour receive a daily allowance to cover meals and incidentals. Amounts differ for home and away tours, with overseas per diems typically denominated in foreign currency and domestically in rupees. The figures are standardised and processed centrally, separate from match fees.
    • Series and tournament bonuses: Series wins and ICC tournament performances are often recognised through bonuses, sometimes linked to prize‑money pools, sometimes direct board rewards. Players usually receive a defined share when India wins a trophy; support staff shares are laid out in the same framework.
    • Milestone or role‑based add‑ons: Leadership roles or long service in a format can attract add‑ons in some cycles. These are not public line items, but they appear in revised communication and reflected in payouts.

    IPL salaries versus BCCI income

    The IPL reshaped the earnings profile of the Indian cricketer. For many leading names, the single biggest cheque in a year arrives from a franchise, not the board. That does not diminish the BCCI retainer’s importance; it creates two parallel income streams that serve different purposes.

    Core differences

    • Employer: IPL salaries are paid by franchises; BCCI retainers and match fees are paid by the board.
    • Tenure: IPL compensation covers a short, intense window; BCCI income covers the full annual cycle.
    • Selection: IPL income is market‑driven via auction or retention, independent of national selection; BCCI income flows by selection and grading.
    • Caps and caps: There is a salary cap on franchise squads. There is no cap on what a player can earn from BCCI match fees if they play frequently across formats.

    IPL pay landscape for Indian players

    • Retentions: Established Indian stars are frequently retained by franchises in the ₹12–17 crore range per season, adjusted by franchise strategy, role and purse dynamics.
    • Auction spikes: When an Indian player hits the auction with form, scarcity, or a specialist skill set (for example, a death‑overs pacer or powerplay basher), bids can surge to match or surpass top retentions.
    • Payment schedule: Franchises typically pay in tranches through the tournament window, with compliance and taxes handled under league rules. Injuries do not automatically void payments; replacement rules and insurance provisions vary by contract.

    What this means to a top India player: Consider a multi‑format mainstay in Grade A+ who is retained by an IPL franchise at the top bracket. The BCCI retainer is ₹7 crore. Add match fees—say, eight Tests, fifteen ODIs, and twelve T20Is in a cycle—and the international match‑fee component alone easily clears an additional ₹2–3 crore. Add Test incentives, series bonuses, and then the IPL cheque. The aggregated cricket income can sit well above ₹20 crore before endorsements.

    Domestic cricket salaries: Ranji, Vijay Hazare, Syed Mushtaq Ali, Duleep, Deodhar

    Domestic cricket is the foundation of the system, and its pay structure has been overhauled to reward experience and longevity.

    How domestic match fees work

    • Paid per day (red ball) and per game (white ball).
    • Experience slabs: Senior men’s match fees are tiered by the number of first‑class matches played. Greater experience attracts a higher day rate.
    • Playing XI status: Fees apply to the playing XI; squad members who do not take the field receive allowances but not full match fees.

    Typical senior men’s domestic fee framework

    • Ranji Trophy (multi‑day): paid per day of play. Experienced players draw a higher day rate (widely reported as ₹60,000 per day for the top slab, with lower slabs at ₹50,000 and ₹40,000). A four‑day game at the top slab yields around ₹2.4 lakh per match.
    • Vijay Hazare Trophy (one‑day): paid per match at a lower day rate than Ranji (commonly cited at ₹25,000 per game for the top slab, with lower slabs stepping down).
    • Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy (T20): paid per match at a T20‑reflective day rate (commonly reported around the mid‑teens in thousands for the top slab per game).
    • Duleep and Deodhar: zonal and inter‑zonal tournaments follow similar per‑day or per‑game fee structures aligned with first‑class or List A status.

    Pathway and support

    • India A: Match fees sit above domestic but below full international rates, with travel and allowances aligned with national standards. India A tours are important both financially and for selectors’ visibility.
    • U19: Players receive match fees and allowances appropriate to age‑group status, with equipment and NCA support covered. The real “salary” for a breakout U19 star often arrives later through IPL contracts and a faster path to senior domestic grades.

    Women’s cricket salaries and the WPL equation

    Women’s cricket in India now mirrors the men’s structure in its broad lines, with a central retainer, equal match fees for international caps, and a league layer via the WPL.

    International match fees (women)

    • Test: ₹15,00,000 per match (parity with men)
    • ODI: ₹6,00,000 per match
    • T20I: ₹3,00,000 per match

    Women’s central contracts (retainers)

    • Three‑grade structure (A/B/C) with retainers significantly lower than the men’s A+–C slab but offering stability and a clear progression ladder for players moving from domestic to international status. The A grade is widely reported in the multiple tens of lakhs, with B and C stepping down.

    WPL salaries

    • Auction and retention dynamics mirror the IPL at a smaller purse scale. Top Indian players have secured multi‑crore deals, with leading batters and all‑rounders anchoring the highest brackets.
    • Payment cycle is league‑bound; endorsements often grow in tandem with WPL visibility.

    The WPL effect: The league has re‑priced skill sets, particularly power‑play hitting, wrist‑spin, and seam‑bowling all‑rounders. Domestic stalwarts who once relied on central retainers now add a franchise cheque that can exceed their annual BCCI retainer.

    Highest‑paid Indian cricketers right now

    On pure cricket income, the highest‑paid Indian cricketers combine a top BCCI grade with heavy international workloads and a premium IPL contract. Names move with form and leadership roles, but the pattern is consistent:

    • A batting talisman on an A+ retainer with a long red‑ball and white‑ball run for India and a high‑end franchise contract sits near the top of the list.
    • A frontline quick who plays Tests at home and away, leads white‑ball attacks, and commands a prime franchise deal matches or surpasses top batters on a total compensation basis, largely because Test incentives magnify red‑ball earnings.
    • White‑ball‑only superstars trail slightly on match fees yet keep parity via IPL numbers and endorsements.

    Examples that fit the profile include Virat Kohli, Rohit Sharma, Jasprit Bumrah, KL Rahul, Rishabh Pant, Hardik Pandya and Shubman Gill. The precise rank among them flips year to year as availability, injuries, and auction outcomes change. Commercially, Kohli remains in a different orbit because endorsements dwarf salary in his case.

    Player‑led examples: what a season looks like in rupees

    These are illustrative scenarios based on widely reported figures. Taxes and penalties are not applied here, and Test incentives can push these numbers higher.

    Example 1: Grade A+ three‑format mainstay

    • Retainer: ₹7,00,00,000
    • Tests: 8 caps × ₹15,00,000 = ₹1,20,00,000
    • ODIs: 15 caps × ₹6,00,000 = ₹90,00,000
    • T20Is: 12 caps × ₹3,00,000 = ₹36,00,000
    • Match fees subtotal: ₹2,46,00,000
    • Test incentives and bonuses: varies by cycle; assume ₹50,00,000 for sustained red‑ball load (illustrative)
    • IPL: franchise retention at ₹16–17 crore (illustrative range)

    Cricket income before endorsements: approximately ₹26–27 crore in this scenario.

    Example 2: Grade A white‑ball specialist with limited Tests

    • Retainer: ₹5,00,00,000
    • Tests: 0
    • ODIs: 18 caps × ₹6,00,000 = ₹1,08,00,000
    • T20Is: 18 caps × ₹3,00,000 = ₹54,00,000
    • Match fees subtotal: ₹1,62,00,000
    • IPL: auction or retention in ₹10–15 crore band (illustrative)

    Cricket income before endorsements: approximately ₹17–22 crore in this scenario depending on the franchise number.

    Example 3: Senior domestic pro without central contract

    • Ranji: 8 matches at top slab × roughly ₹2,40,000 per match ≈ ₹19,20,000
    • Vijay Hazare: 10 matches at ₹25,000 per match ≈ ₹2,50,000
    • Syed Mushtaq Ali: 10 matches at a mid‑teens day rate ≈ ₹1,50,000–₹1,75,000
    • Zonal competitions and Duleep/Deodhar appearances add similar per‑match numbers.
    • IPL: if uncapped and undrafted, the league component may be zero; if signed at a base price, add a few tens of lakhs to a crore.

    This is a solid living, improved markedly by match‑fee reforms and stability programs for domestic players.

    Taxes, insurance, pensions and the unglamorous details

    Gross versus net is a gulf in professional sport, and cricket is no different.

    Income tax and compliance

    • Indian residents pay income tax at applicable slab rates on BCCI and IPL earnings, plus surcharge and cess as relevant. TDS is deducted at source for many payments.
    • International earnings and per diems are declared as per Indian tax law. The board’s finance team and player agencies ensure paperwork aligns with domestic regulations.
    • State‑level professional tax can apply when representing a state side. Match fees paid by state associations have their own compliance.

    Insurance and injury protection

    • Central contracts include robust medical insurance coverage. If a player is injured on national duty, BCCI covers treatment and rehabilitation at the NCA, and match fees are not retroactively clawed back for games already played.
    • IPL contracts include their own injury clauses and insurance. Mid‑tournament injuries can trigger replacement mechanisms while protecting the player’s agreed compensation, subject to contract language.

    Pension and long‑service recognition

    • BCCI runs a pension scheme for retired cricketers across tiers—international, first‑class and domestic. Payouts were enhanced in recent reforms, acknowledging service to Indian cricket across generations.
    • The pension acknowledges an era when match fees were modest. Today’s domestic pro still benefits from this safety net after a career of Ranji seasons.

    Allowances and logistics

    • First‑class travel and premium accommodation on tour are standard for national sides. Domestic travel has been upgraded across teams in recent seasons.
    • Daily allowances are provided home and away, with overseas per diems denominated in foreign currency and aligned with local costs.
    • Equipment sponsorships lighten the personal expense load for senior players; younger players often receive NCA support.

    How BCCI decides central contracts and match fees

    The process is grounded in selection and usage. National selectors, the team management and the board administration review player workloads across formats, their role in leadership or transition plans, and their availability. Red‑ball commitment is explicitly valued in grading. Match fees, meanwhile, are policy decisions taken by the board, with strategic emphasis placed on preserving Test cricket’s prestige through higher per‑match payments and additional incentives.

    How IPL and BCCI income complement each other

    The board wants national caps to be aspirational and financially defensible even in the franchise era. That’s why the Test match fee is so substantial. The IPL, conversely, incentivises specialization, power skills, and high‑variance roles that might not always be rewarded in the international grind. Together, they allow:

    • A tearaway quick to be rewarded handsomely for red‑ball series while enjoying franchise security.
    • A white‑ball finisher to prosper in the IPL even during periods of national rotation.
    • A domestic veteran to make a stable living through Ranji and white‑ball gigs, with the lottery ticket of an IPL or WPL call‑up.

    Domestic match‑fee slabs explained with nuance

    The experience‑based slab isn’t only a reward for seniority. It’s an incentive for players to stay engaged in red‑ball cricket through their twenties and early thirties, even if white‑ball franchise opportunities beckon. That stability matters for state sides that need a bedrock of experience in the dressing room—someone who can pace a chase on a greentop in Rajkot in the morning session or guide a young quick through a rough spell in Visakhapatnam humidity. Money, in other words, supports the culture that produces India players.

    A note on reserve players and rain‑affected matches

    • Reserves: Traveling reserves draw allowances, not match fees. The playing XI are paid the fee, and a concussion sub who takes the field becomes eligible. It’s straightforward and avoids grey zones.
    • Weather: If a match begins and you take the field, you earn the fee even if the game is later shortened or abandoned under the playing conditions. A completely washed‑out game with no toss and no play typically doesn’t trigger match fees.

    India versus Australia and England: where India sits

    India’s per‑match international fees are among the highest in the game, with Tests particularly well‑compensated. Central retainers are also at the top end globally. The IPL dwarfs most domestic T20 leagues financially, giving Indian players access to a franchise pay ceiling unmatched in other countries. Australia and England, meanwhile, run strong central systems with high retainers and premium Test emphasis, but their domestic league cheques for locals (BBL and Hundred) generally sit below the IPL’s top Indian brackets. This relative strength shows up in India’s ability to keep red‑ball cricket financially credible for its stars while maintaining the world’s most lucrative T20 ecosystem.

    Endorsements: the shadow economy bigger than salary

    For India’s biggest names, endorsements frequently exceed cricket salary by multiples. The categories are diverse—tech, finance, automotive, FMCG, athleisure—and the calendar is relentless. A good month around a marquee series can produce multiple ad shoots, content deliverables, and social integrations. Appearance fees for brand days can match or exceed a single ODI match fee. That’s why a complete picture of “highest paid” is impossible without acknowledging brand income. But the focus here stays on cricket salary mechanics, because that’s the most transparent and consistent element of the portfolio.

    Women’s pathway and domestic ecosystem

    Women’s domestic match fees have been on an upward curve, with the board investing in longer calendars, broader squads, and improved logistics. Central contracts remain the anchor, and the WPL has added life‑changing opportunities for a new cohort of Indian players who might have previously played a decade of domestic cricket without a transformative paycheck. Between equal match fees internationally and a growing commercial stage domestically, the system is finally aligned with the on‑field standard.

    How a debutant earns in India

    Your first India cap immediately places you on the per‑match fee track. The retainer arrives when the central contract list is announced, not at debut. Some debutants receive a contract within the cycle if they are clearly in long‑term plans; others remain uncapped contract‑wise but still draw match fees for every cap they earn. Back home, state associations often award performance bonuses for first caps and milestone games, a cultural nod that also helps soften the grind of early‑career finances.

    A domestic pro’s year, financially and emotionally

    Picture a reliable Ranji number five who averages in the mid‑forties, fields at slip, and bowls a few overs of wobble seam when needed. He travels economy, stays in good hotels, and logs miles across the country. A good red‑ball season is eight or nine matches, each match potentially worth a couple of lakhs at the top slab. Toss in ten Vijay Hazare games and a dozen Syed Mushtaq Ali fixtures, and the earnings are respectable, particularly in the stronger state units where facilities are excellent. An India A call‑up adds a gravy layer; an IPL base contract shifts the tax bracket. The salary system doesn’t just reward the headline names; it keeps thousands of overs, catches, and hard yards financially sustainable.

    Practical salary calculator: build your own season total

    A simple way to model your cricket income for the year:

    • Start with your retainer (₹7 crore, ₹5 crore, ₹3 crore, or ₹1 crore; or zero if not contracted).
    • Add international match fees: Test caps × ₹15 lakh, ODI caps × ₹6 lakh, T20I caps × ₹3 lakh.
    • Add Test incentives if you are a regular in the format.
    • Add IPL or WPL pay if contracted by a franchise.
    • Add domestic match fees: Ranji days × your day rate slab + white‑ball matches × their per‑game rates.
    • Add bonuses for series wins or tournament placings where applicable.
    • Subtract taxes and compliance costs to estimate take‑home.

    By running just a few lines of arithmetic, players, agents, and even curious fans can see how strongly match volume shapes income at the top level and how a single IPL or WPL contract transforms the domestic player’s trajectory.

    Nuances that matter but rarely make headlines

    • Central contracts and rest: Workload management can reduce the raw number of match fees a player earns in a cycle, but the retainer protects income when strategically rested.
    • Code of conduct: Fines can reduce match fees; multiple breaches in a cycle sting.
    • NCA rehab: Injured centrally contracted players undergo rehab at the NCA with full medical support. Salaries are not stopped; match fees are naturally tied to appearances.
    • Selection volatility: A player who slips out of a white‑ball XI for form may still stack Test fees if he remains in red‑ball plans, and vice versa. The portfolio model cushions the dips.

    Domestic match fees: the experience slab in detail

    The slab system is worth a closer look because it changed the calculus for mid‑career and senior pros:

    • Up to 20 first‑class matches: entry slab, foundational earnings, encouraging consistency and availability.
    • 21–40 matches: mid slab, acknowledging experience and dressing‑room value.
    • Above 40 matches: top slab, a reward for longevity and leadership in state colors.

    This is measured at the start of the season. A player who crosses a threshold mid‑season typically gains the higher rate from the next match or next tournament per association interpretation, with the board’s guidelines providing the framework.

    The quiet economy: allowances, travel class, equipment

    The day‑to‑day matters because the schedule is grueling. Business‑class travel for overseas tours, upgraded domestic flights on certain routes, two‑kit allowances, boots replaced when they split under the strain, and the quick FedEx from a bat sponsor when a blade dies in the nets—these are not line items in a salary table, but they protect take‑home income by reducing out‑of‑pocket costs.

    How state associations top up player welfare

    The stronger associations run bonus pools for Ranji runs and wickets, player‑of‑the‑season awards, and insurance top‑ups. Younger players receive education and certification support, especially around fitness, nutrition and anti‑doping. These don’t show up as “salary,” but they increase the effective wage and long‑term employability of domestic cricketers.

    Where the money comes from: BCCI revenues and player salary

    India’s pay structures are powered by massive media rights, sponsorship, and packed stadiums. The board allocates a defined portion of its revenue to player payments, both international and domestic. That translates into the world‑leading per‑match fees and robust domestic reforms outlined here. It also funds the NCA, pathway tours, and pensions—a virtuous loop where the sport’s popularity underwrites the livelihoods of its practitioners across tiers.

    The women’s growth curve and what comes next

    Equal match fees were a turning point. Now the challenge is calendar depth: more Tests, broader ODI and T20I tours, and a domestic structure rich enough to keep players sharp between WPL windows. As the WPL matures, top Indian women will see a salary distribution that starts to resemble the men’s blend: a steady central retainer, a solid per‑match spine, and a franchise cheque that can become the largest line item. The same feedback loop applies: visibility drives endorsements, which further narrows the historical gap in total earnings.

    Comparing roles: why a Test quick can out‑earn a T20 finisher on cricket income

    Match fees tell a quiet story. A four‑Test home series and a five‑Test overseas tour generate nine match fees at ₹15 lakh each, before incentives. Add ODIs and T20Is around that, and a frontline quick who shoulders a full red‑ball load can pass peers who play only white‑ball internationals, even if the white‑ball peer wins the IPL auction. The structure defends the hardest art in cricket—bowling long spells with the old ball in unforgiving conditions—and it does so with money, not just rhetoric.

    A careful word on accuracy and revisions

    Contract lists, retainers, per‑match fees, domestic slabs and league salaries are subject to revision. Figures cited above reflect the latest widely reported numbers and board communications. Where the board hasn’t published a line item, ranges and common reports are used to reflect reality. This page tracks those changes and is refreshed promptly each cycle.

    Sources and attribution

    This guide distills official BCCI releases, press conferences, and circulars; reporting from ESPNcricinfo, Cricbuzz and Wisden; and confirmation from national dailies with robust sports desks. It also reflects first‑hand knowledge from years of covering contracts, auctions, and domestic reforms.

    Summary tables

    Men’s BCCI central contracts (retainer)

    Grade Annual retainer (INR) Notes
    A+ 7,00,00,000 Multi‑format mainstays
    A 5,00,00,000 Core players across at least one format
    B 3,00,00,000 Regulars or specialists
    C 1,00,00,000 Emerging or situational picks

    International match fees (men and women; playing XI)

    Format Fee per match (INR) Notes
    Test 15,00,000 Red‑ball incentives can add to this
    ODI 6,00,000 One‑day internationals
    T20I 3,00,000 T20 internationals

    Domestic match fees (senior men; typical)

    Tournament Basis Indicative fee
    Ranji Trophy Per day of play 40,000–60,000 per day (experience‑based)
    Vijay Hazare Trophy Per match Around 25,000 per game (top slab)
    Syed Mushtaq Ali Per match Mid‑teens in thousands per game (top slab)

    Women’s compensation

    Component Indicative value
    Central contract grades Three tiers (A/B/C) in multiple tens of lakhs downwards
    International match fees Equal to men (Test ₹15 lakh; ODI ₹6 lakh; T20I ₹3 lakh)
    WPL salaries Franchise‑driven; top Indian players in multi‑crore range

    Strategic takeaways for players and fans

    • The retainer protects, the match fees reward, and the IPL multiplies. That triad is by design.
    • Test cricket remains financially king on a per‑match basis, especially for players who shoulder regular red‑ball workloads.
    • Domestic match‑fee reforms have made a state cricket career sustainable and respectable, especially at the top experience slab.
    • Equal match fees for women at the international level and the WPL’s rise signal a structural, not cosmetic, change.

    Closing thoughts

    Cricket’s economy in India is not a mystery if you follow the money with empathy for the craft that earns it. A Grade A+ retainer is a handshake for being the beating heart of a national team. A Test fee is a thank‑you for bowling the fiftieth over in Chennai heat or batting through a final session in Centurion twilight. A domestic day rate is the quiet nod to the pros who keep the lights on through January mornings in Rajkot and October evenings in Lucknow. The IPL and WPL are the fireworks that grab your eye, but the BCCI salary structure is the constant, an architecture that lets a teenager dream of a life in cricket and a veteran retire with dignity. When the next contract list reshuffles, the amounts may evolve, but the logic will hold: reward commitment, protect the spine of the calendar, and give every pathway a fair shot at real, sustainable income.